Home  |  Doctors  |  Students  |  Organizations  |  Health & Fitness  |  News  | Message Boards  |  About Us  |


 


















































 








 













Patrons Doctor
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Back

Men and violence:

A man's world

Violence is a common feature of most societies. Statistically, we know that it's predominantly a male characteristic, particularly one of young males. In England and Wales for example, more than 90 per cent of violent offenders are male, and half of those are aged between 17 and 24. So why are men, and particularly young men, so prone to acts of violence?

Natural-born fighters

One theory, known as the instinct hypothesis, proposes that aggression is a natural instinct, and has the biological function of ensuring the proper spacing of animals, thereby helping to maintain the stability of the group. The originator of this idea, Conrad Lorenz, observed that members of the same species were aggressive towards each other when they were subject to specific threats. He believed that violent instincts in man are normally expressed in a socially approved way in the modern world, for example through sport, and that failure to find such expression leads to undesirable aggressive acts.

Driven mad

Another view is the frustrated-drive theory. Put simply, this states that aggression arises as a result of the frustration of not getting one's own way. In other words, when an individual is prevented from achieving a goal, this leads to frustration and, possibly, aggression/violence. The degree of aggression that results from this frustration depends on how important the person perceives their goal to be, and on the number of times they have been thwarted in achieving it. Frustration may not necessarily lead to aggression if other inhibiting forces are present, such as awareness of the anticipated consequences of aggression (eg punishment). And aggression, when it occurs, may be displaced onto objects other than the frustrating agent (eg kicking a cat when you're actually angry with the cat's owner).

This view may explain some aspects of aggression but it cannot account for the whole picture. Frustration leads to different responses in different people. Some respond with dejection and resignation, others with a positive, active effort to overcome whatever barriers are in their way. This theory also fails to explain some types of violence, including sadistic acts or those carried out in defence of a reputation.

Chemical reaction

So, if violent acts are not simply the result of frustration due to external stimuli, perhaps we need to look at the human body (particularly the male

Back