|
|
|
|

|
|
Back to List |
|
Rhabdoid Tumor
of the Kidney |
|
Background:
Rhabdoid tumor of the kidney (RTK)
is one of the most aggressive and lethal
malignancies in pediatric oncology. It initially
was described as a rhabdomyosarcomatoid variant of
Wilms tumor because of the resemblance of its
cells to rhabdomyoblasts; however, the absence of
muscle differentiation led Haas and colleagues to
coin the term rhabdoid tumor of the kidney in
1981. Although the National Wilms Tumor Study
Group (NWTSG) traditionally has studied RTK, this
tumor now is recognized as a separate entity from
Wilms tumor. In contrast to Wilms tumor, RTK is
characterized by the high incidence of metastatic
disease and resistance to chemotherapy. Whereas
the overall survival rate for Wilms tumor exceeds
85%, the survival rate for RTK is only 20-25%.
This article summarizes current knowledge
regarding the biology and treatment of RTK.
Pathophysiology:
The histogenetic origin of
RTK remains obscure. Rhabdoid tumor cells are
polyphenotypic, with an immunostaining pattern
that shows evidence of mesenchymal, epithelial,
and neural differentiation. The polyantigenic
expression suggests that RTK arises from a
pluripotent cell capable of differentiating along
several lines.
Cytogenetic studies, fluorescent
in situ hybridization (FISH), and loss of
heterozygosity (LOH) studies have revealed that
RTK frequently contains deletions at band 22q11.1.
Through positional cloning efforts, this locus
recently was found to contain the hSNF5/INI1
gene, which encodes a member of the human SWI/SNF
complex. The SWI/SNF complex acts in an
adenosine triphosphate (ATP)–dependent manner to
remodel chromatin, which regulates gene
transcription. Because most RTKs demonstrate
biallelic inactivating mutations of hSNF5/INI1
consistent with the 2-hit model of tumor
formation, this gene is presumed to function as a
classic tumor suppressor. The observation that
mice haplo-insufficient for hSNF5/INI1
are predisposed to rhabdoid tumor supports this
premise. The hSNF5/INI1 gene likely
regulates the transcription of numerous human
genes; however, the precise molecular pathways
involved in rhabdoid tumorigenesis remain unknown.
Since the original description
of RTK, malignant rhabdoid tumors have been
described at multiple anatomic sites, including
the brain, liver, soft tissues, lung, skin, and
heart. Considerable debate has focused on whether
extrarenal rhabdoid tumors represent the same
entity as RTK. The recent recognition that CNS
atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs) have
mutations or deletions of the hSNF5/INI1
gene indicates that rhabdoid tumors of the kidney
and of the brain are identical or closely related
entities. This is not surprising, because rhabdoid
tumors at both locations possess similar
histologic, clinical, and demographic features.
Moreover, 10-15% of patients with RTK have
synchronous or metachronous brain tumors; germline
hSNF5/INI1 mutations were demonstrated in
several such patients. Renal tumors and brain
tumors had distinct hSNF5/INI1 mutations;
this indicates that the patients had multifocal,
rather than metastatic, disease.
Whether extrarenal/extracranial
rhabdoid tumors have the same histogenetic origin
as their renal counterparts is less clear. Whereas
some extrarenal/extracranial rhabdoid tumors are
considered undifferentiated sarcomas or carcinomas
with rhabdoid features, others likely represent
true rhabdoid tumors because they have documented
hSNF5/INI1 mutations. As screening for
hSNF5/INI1 mutations becomes more
widespread, the classification and prognostication
of tumors with rhabdoid features should become
better defined. Furthermore, as molecular-based
targeted therapies emerge, the distinction between
true and pseudorhabdoid tumors may prove to have
important therapeutic implications.
Frequency:
- In the US:
RTK is a rare tumor.
According to registration data from the NWTSG,
RTK comprises only 1.6% of childhood renal
tumors. Approximately 5-10 newly diagnosed
patients are registered with the NWTSG per year.
- Internationally:
The International
Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) has
reported that RTK comprises 0.9% of childhood
renal tumors.
Mortality/Morbidity:
The overall
survival rate for patients with RTK enrolled in
NWTS-1 to NWTS-4 was 23.6%. Higher-stage disease
correlates with more adverse outcome; most
patients present with stage III or IV disease (see
Table 1). In addition,
diagnosis when patients are younger than 1 year is
associated with an unfavorable prognosis. RTK is a
rapidly progressive tumor, with most deaths
occurring within 12 months of presentation. The
most common sites of metastasis at presentation
are the lungs, abdominal lymph nodes, liver, and
brain.
Table 1. Survival Rates for Patients with
Rhabdoid Tumor of the Kidney in National Wilms
Tumor Study, 1969-1994
|
Stage |
National
Wilms Tumor Study-1 to National Wilms Tumor
Study-3 (No of
patients) |
National
Wilms Tumor Study-1 to National Wilms Tumor
Study-4 (No of
patients) |
|
I |
50% (6) |
42.3% (22) |
|
II |
44% (9) |
|
III |
22% (37) |
17.8% (73) |
|
IV |
0% (18) |
Race:
No apparent racial predilection
exists.
Sex:
RTK occurs slightly more frequently
in males than in females, with a male-to-female
ratio of 1.4:1.
Age:
The median age at presentation is
11 months, with a mean age of 16 months. Most
patients are younger than 2 years. RTK has been
reported in older children and adults, but whether
these patients had true rhabdoid tumors or other
poorly differentiated tumors with rhabdoid
features is unclear.
History:
- Children with RTK present
with signs and symptoms related to a renal mass.
- Pain is difficult to assess
because the median presenting age is 11 months;
however, fussiness is reported in most patients.
- Gross hematuria is a
presenting feature in approximately 60% of
patients; by contrast, only 20% of patients with
Wilms tumor have gross hematuria.
- Fever is a presenting symptom
in 50% of patients with RTK, compared to 25% of
patients with Wilms tumor.
- Approximately 10% of patients
with RTK have synchronous CNS lesions. Symptoms
of increased intracranial pressure or neurologic
changes should prompt further evaluation.
Physical:
- The physical examination of
patients with RTK is most remarkable for the
presence of a large intraabdominal mass.
- Hypertension (ie, blood
pressure >95th percentile) is observed in as
many as 70% of patients.
- In contrast to Wilms tumor,
RTK is not associated with the WAGR syndrome (ie,
Wilms [tumor], aniridia, genitourinary
[anomalies], and [mental] retardation) or with
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (ie, organomegaly,
large birth weight, macroglossia, and
hemihypertrophy).
- Evidence of focal neurologic
signs or increased intracranial pressure should
be evaluated in light of the prevalence of
synchronous CNS tumors.
Causes:
Although mutations or deletions of
the hSNF5/INI1 gene have an established
role in the development of RTK, the events that
incite these genetic alterations are unknown. In
spite of the presence of germline hSNF5/INI1
mutations in approximately 15% of patients with
RTK, only 2 cases of familial RTK have been
reported. No environmental or infectious
associations with RTK have been established.
Other Problems to be
Considered:
Renal cell carcinoma
Renal medullary carcinoma
Primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney
Undifferentiated sarcoma with rhabdoid features
Lab Studies:
- The definitive diagnosis of
RTK is indicated by histologic analysis.
However, laboratory studies can be used to
differentiate patients with RTK and patients
with Wilms tumor.
- CBC: Approximately 55% of
patients with RTK present with a hemoglobin
level less than 9 g/dL. Only 25% of patients
with Wilms tumor are anemic at presentation.
- Urinalysis: Hematuria is
observed in 75% of patients with RTK.
Approximately 25% of patients have proteinuria.
- Serum calcium
determination: As many as 25% of patients with
RTK present with paraneoplastic hypercalcemia.
This is attributed to the ectopic production
of parathyroid hormone–related protein by the
tumor. Hypercalcemia is uncommon in Wilms
tumor but is associated with congenital
mesoblastic nephroma.
Imaging Studies:
- No pathognomonic imaging
feature can distinguish RTK from the other renal
tumors occurring in childhood; however, several
features may raise suspicion of RTK. The
following imaging studies are suggested for the
diagnosis and staging of RTK:
- CT scan of the abdomen
- RTK typically appears as
a large lobulated mass located in the center
or the periphery of the kidney. The margins
of the tumor may be defined sharply from the
adjacent renal parenchyma, or they may be
indistinct. Tumor lobules often are
separated by low-density areas of hemorrhage
or necrosis.
- Calcification frequently
occurs in RTK, whereas it is observed in
approximately 10% of Wilms tumors and rarely
occurs in clear cell sarcoma or congenital
mesoblastic nephroma. RTK-associated
calcifications are often linear or
curvilinear, and they outline tumor lobules
(see
Image 1).
A peripheral subcapsular
crescent-shaped fluid collection often is
observed in association with RTK. In one
recent study, this finding was present in
71% of patients (15 of 21) with RTK but only
8% of patients (8 of 93) with Wilms tumors,
14% of patients (6 of 44) with congenital
mesoblastic nephromas, and 25% of patients
(3 of 12) with clear cell sarcomas. These
subcapsular fluid collections may be caused
by hemorrhage or tumor necrosis.
- Abdominal ultrasound: Tumor
invasion of the renal vein and/or the inferior
vena cava sometimes occurs with RTK and is
best diagnosed with the use of Doppler
ultrasound or magnetic resonance angiography.
- MRI or CT scan of brain:
Once the diagnosis of RTK has been confirmed,
imaging of the head is indicated to exclude
the possibility of a synchronous primary or
metastatic brain tumor.
Procedures:
- Bone marrow aspirates and
biopsies are not necessary in the workup of a
patient with RTK because RTK rarely metastasizes
to bone marrow.
- Lumbar puncture is not
necessary unless a CNS tumor is diagnosed.
Histologic Findings:
Grossly, RTKs are
bulky, friable, gray-tan masses with areas of
necrosis and hemorrhage that typically involve the
medial portion of the kidney. Almost all cases are
unilateral. Microscopically, RTK is characterized
by sheets of large tumor cells with vesicular
nuclei, prominent red nucleoli, moderate amounts
of eosinophilic cytoplasm, and pale
intracytoplasmic rhabdoid inclusions. Other
patterns described as sclerosing (including
chondroid), epithelioid, spindled, lymphomatoid or
histiocytoid, and vascular may coexist with the
classic pattern.
Unlike Wilms tumor, RTK
typically has an infiltrative border with the
surrounding nonneoplastic cortex and renal
medulla. Ultrastructurally, the most useful
finding is a large whorl of intermediate filaments
within the cytoplasm that correlates with the
rhabdoid inclusion observed with light microscopy.
Dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum, rudimentary
cell junctions, and cytoplasmic tonofilamentlike
bundles are other characteristic features. The
cells do not show external lamina or evidence of
myogenic differentiation.
Immunohistochemically, the tumor
cells are polyphenotypic with consistent staining
for vimentin, and most are positive for epithelial
membrane antigen and/or cytokeratin. Positive test
results for glial fibrillary acidic protein,
neuron-specific enolase, smooth muscle actin,
desmin, CD99, and other markers have been observed
in RTK and AT/RT.
The pathologic diagnosis of RTK
may be difficult and should be made cautiously in
patients outside the typical clinical setting (eg,
patients >3 y). Renal tumors in which rhabdoid
features have been described include Wilms tumor,
renal cell carcinoma, renal medullary carcinoma,
transitional cell carcinoma, renal
rhabdomyosarcoma, and primitive neuroepithelial
tumor. In most instances, review of additional
tumor sections for other lines of differentiation,
a broad immunohistochemical profile, and
ultrastructural analysis can help make the
distinction.
Staging:
Staging for RTK in North
America follows the staging system of the NWTSG,
which is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. National Wilms Tumor
Study Group Staging System
| Stage |
Findings |
| I |
Tumor is limited to the
kidney and completely excised. The renal
capsule is intact. The tumor was not ruptured
or sampled for biopsy before its removal
(fine-needle aspiration is excluded from this
restriction). The vessels of the renal sinus
are not involved. No evidence of tumor at or
beyond the margins of resection is present. |
| II |
Tumor is extended beyond
the kidney but was excised completely. One may
observe regional extension of tumor into the
renal sinus or penetration of the renal
capsule. The blood vessels outside the renal
sinus may contain tumor, but this tumor must
be removed en bloc with the remainder of the
primary tumor. Biopsy may have been performed.
Tumor spillage occurring before or during
surgery was confined to the flank and did not
involve the peritoneal surface. No evidence of
tumor at or beyond the margins of resection is
present. |
| III |
Residual nonhematogenous
tumor is present and confined to the abdomen.
Any one of the following may occur: (1) lymph
nodes within the abdomen or pelvis are found
to be involved by tumor, (2) the tumor has
penetrated the peritoneal surface, (3) tumor
implants are found on the peritoneal surface,
(4) gross or microscopic tumor remains
postoperatively, (5) tumor is not completely
resectable because of local infiltration of
vital structures, and (6) tumor spillage
occurring before or during surgery was not
confined to the flank. |
| IV |
Hematogenous metastases or
lymph node metastases are located outside the
abdominal/pelvic cavity. |
| V |
Tumors are bilateral. |
Medical Care:
Following surgical removal
of the primary tumor, chemotherapy is indicated as
adjuvant treatment of RTK. Historically,
chemotherapy for RTK was based on therapy for
Wilms tumor, which included vincristine,
actinomycin, and doxorubicin, with or without
cyclophosphamide. With these agents, the projected
rate of survival for patients with RTK was only
23%.
To improve upon these results,
the NWTS-5 used a strategy consisting of
carboplatin/etoposide alternating with
cyclophosphamide. This treatment arm recently was
closed because preliminary analysis indicated that
this regimen was unlikely to improve patient
outcome. Recent case reports have documented
successful outcomes in patients with metastatic
RTK treated with ifosfamide/carboplatin/etoposide
(ICE) or ifosfamide/etoposide (IE) and alternating
with vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (VDC).
Based on these reports, an ICE/VDC regimen likely
will constitute the backbone of the next national
clinical trial.
Insights into the treatment of
RTK may be derived from the experience with CNS
AT/RT. Like RTK, AT/RT is associated with a very
unfavorable prognosis and is characterized by
resistance to chemotherapy. A literature review by
Hilden and colleagues revealed that only 17% of
patients (6 of 35) with AT/RT survived disease
free, with a follow-up range of 5-89 months.
Survivors were treated with surgery, radiation
therapy (XRT), and various chemotherapy regimens,
typically including cisplatin, etoposide,
vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, actinomycin,
cyclophosphamide, and intrathecal chemotherapy.
One survivor was treated with high-dose therapy
and autologous stem cell rescue. Experience with
AT/RT has demonstrated that these tumors generally
are initially responsive to chemotherapy, but then
they quickly become refractory to treatment.
The lack of treatment uniformity
among reported patients makes determination of
radiotherapy efficacy for RTK difficult. In NWTS-1
to NWTS-5, XRT has been administered to the flank
or abdomen at total doses of 1080-3500 cGy, but
the optimal dose is yet to be determined. XRT is a
cornerstone of therapy for CNS AT/RT, and the high
doses delivered to the posterior fossa may improve
patient outcome.
Surgical Care:
Refer children with a
suspected renal malignancy to a pediatric surgeon
or urologist with experience in oncologic surgery.
A large transabdominal,
transperitoneal incision is recommended for
adequate exposure. Once the peritoneal cavity is
entered, the extent of the tumor should be
assessed, including inspection of the
contralateral kidney to exclude bilateral disease.
If the mass is unilateral, a radical nephrectomy
with subtotal ureterectomy should be performed.
Because tumor spillage upstages the tumor,
removing the tumor en bloc, avoiding tumor
spillage into the peritoneal cavity, is important.
If the mass involves the upper pole of the kidney,
the adrenal gland should be removed. Lymph nodes
from the iliac, paraaortic, and celiac areas
should be sampled, even if they do not appear
abnormal. A lymph node dissection is not
indicated. If the tumor is bilateral or
unresectable, biopsies should be performed. If
Wilms tumor is diagnosed, then preoperative
chemotherapy is recommended to shrink the tumor,
facilitating subsequent resection. If RTK is
diagnosed, then complete removal of the tumor is
advised.
Consultations:
Therapy for RTK is
intensive and requires a multidisciplinary effort.
Consider consulting a pediatric oncologist, a
pediatric surgeon or urologist, a radiation
oncologist, a social worker, and a nutritionist.
Diet:
No dietary restrictions are
necessary. Closely monitor patients' nutritional
status to ensure adequate caloric intake during
the intensive chemotherapy. Requirement of
parenteral nutrition at some point during
treatment is not uncommon.
Activity:
No restrictions on
activity are necessary except during periods of
thrombocytopenia.
Treatment of RTK remains
investigational, and no accepted standard therapy
exists for this disease. Enrolling patients on
clinical trials is encouraged strongly. At St.
Jude Children's Research Hospital, a regimen of
ICE alternating with VDC has been used to treat
patients with RTK.
Drug Category:
Antineoplastics agents -- Antineoplastic
agents interfere with cell reproduction. Some
agents are cell cycle specific, while others (eg,
alkylating agents, anthracyclines, cisplatin) are
not phase specific. Cellular apoptosis (ie,
programmed cell death) is also a potential
mechanism of many antineoplastic agents.
Drug Name
|
Doxorubicin (Adriamycin) --
Inhibits topoisomerase II and produces free
radicals, which may cause destruction of DNA.
The combination of these 2 events can, in
turn, inhibit growth of neoplastic cells.
|
| Pediatric
Dose |
VDC regimen for RTK is
currently investigational; refer to pediatric
oncologist |
|
Contraindications |
Documented hypersensitivity;
severe heart failure; cardiomyopathy; impaired
cardiac function; arrhythmias |
|
Interactions |
P-glycoprotein modulators (eg,
cyclosporine, verapamil) can increase active
doxorubicin metabolite concentrations and
increase toxicity; CYP450 inhibitors (eg,
ketoconazole) may increase exposure to
doxorubicin; may decrease phenytoin and
digoxin plasma levels; CYP450 inducers (eg,
phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin) may
decrease plasma levels of doxorubicin;
cyclosporine may induce coma or seizures;
mercaptopurine increases toxicity of
doxorubicin; cyclophosphamide increases
cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin |
| Pregnancy |
D - Unsafe in pregnancy
|
|
Precautions |
Obtain baseline measures of
cardiac function before commencing treatment
with doxorubicin; maintain a record of
cumulative doxorubicin exposure, because risk
of cardiomyopathy increases with cumulative
dose administered; caution in hepatic
dysfunction (reduce dose); may cause severe
local tissue damage (use extravasation
precautions) |
Drug Name
|
Vincristine (Oncovin, Vincasar
PFS) -- Inhibits cellular mitosis by
inhibition of intracellular tubulin function,
binding to microtubule and spindle proteins in
the S phase. |
| Pediatric
Dose |
VDC regimen for RTK is
currently investigational; refer to pediatric
oncologist |
|
Contraindications |
Documented hypersensitivity;
demyelinating form of Charcot-Marie-Tooth
syndrome; fatal if administered intrathecally
|
|
Interactions |
CYP3A4 inhibitors (eg,
itraconazole, erythromycin) may increase
exposure to vincristine and increase
neurologic adverse effects; CYP3A4 inducers (eg,
phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin) may
increase clearance of vincristine; acute
pulmonary reaction may occur when taken
concurrently with mitomycin-C |
| Pregnancy |
D - Unsafe in pregnancy
|
|
Precautions |
Monitor for peripheral
neuropathy manifested by constipation, ileus,
foot drop, ptosis, jaw pain, abdominal pain,
and vocal cord paralysis; reduce dose in
patients with severe peripheral neuropathy;
may cause severe local tissue damage (use
extravasation precautions); caution with
impaired hepatic function (reduce dose);
monitor for SIADH, hyponatremia, and seizures |
Drug Name
|
Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan,
Neosar) -- Chemically related to nitrogen
mustards. Alkylating agent; mechanism of
action of active metabolites may involve
cross-linking of DNA, which may interfere with
growth of normal and neoplastic cells.
|
| Pediatric
Dose |
VDC regimen for RTK is
currently investigational; refer to pediatric
oncologist |
|
Contraindications |
Documented hypersensitivity;
severely depressed bone marrow function
|
|
Interactions |
Barbiturates, allopurinol,
chloramphenicol, chloroquine, imipramine,
phenothiazines, potassium iodide, azole
antifungals, and vitamin A may alter
metabolism of cyclophosphamide and potentially
increase toxicity; cyclophosphamide may
prolong neuromuscular blockade of
succinylcholine; may potentiate
doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity; may
increase effects of anticoagulants; may reduce
digoxin serum levels and antimicrobial effects
of quinolones |
| Pregnancy |
D - Unsafe in pregnancy
|
|
Precautions |
Protect against hemorrhagic
cystitis with adequate hydration and consider
mesna at higher doses; monitor blood counts
for myelosuppression; monitor electrolytes for
hyponatremia related to SIADH; with high
doses, monitor for cardiotoxicity; may cause
infertility, secondary malignancies, and
pulmonary fibrosis |
Drug Name
|
Ifosfamide (Ifex) -- Inhibits
DNA and protein synthesis and, thus, cell
proliferation by causing DNA cross-linking and
denaturation of double helix. |
| Pediatric
Dose |
ICE regimen for RTK is
currently investigational; refer to pediatric
oncologist |
|
Contraindications |
Documented hypersensitivity;
depressed bone marrow function |
|
Interactions |
Drugs that affect CYP-450
hepatic microsomal enzymes (eg, barbiturates,
phenytoin, azole antifungals) may alter
metabolism of ifosfamide; caution with other
nephrotoxic drugs (eg, cisplatin); may enhance
warfarin effects |
| Pregnancy |
D - Unsafe in pregnancy
|
|
Precautions |
Because of association with
renal insufficiency and renal tubular disease
(Fanconi syndrome), use with caution in
patients with a single kidney; however,
results of several series of patients with a
single kidney who were treated with ifosfamide
indicate that the drug can be administered
without clinically significant renal toxicity;
monitor renal function and electrolytes; limit
cumulative exposure to ifosfamide to avoid
nephrotoxicity; implement prehydration and
mesna; monitor for CNS effects of somnolence,
hallucinations, and coma; monitor blood counts
for myelosuppression |
Drug Name
|
Carboplatin (Paraplatin) --
Analog of cisplatin. |
| Pediatric
Dose |
ICE regimen for RTK is
currently investigational; refer to pediatric
oncologist |
|
Contraindications |
Documented hypersensitivity;
hypersensitivity to other platinum-containing
compounds; severely depressed bone marrow
function |
|
Interactions |
Nephrotoxicity increases with
aminoglycosides and other nephrotoxic drugs
|
| Pregnancy |
D - Unsafe in pregnancy
|
|
Precautions |
Use with caution in patients
with a single kidney, even though its
associated nephrotoxicity is not as pronounced
as that associated with cisplatin; some
institutions adjust carboplatin dose according
to patient's renal function; monitor
electrolytes, including calcium and magnesium
levels; monitor blood counts for
myelosuppression, particularly
thrombocytopenia; may cause ototoxicity,
severe hypersensitivity reactions, or
hepatotoxicity |
Drug Name
|
Etoposide (Toposar, VePesid) --
Inhibits topoisomerase II and causes DNA
strand breakage, causing cell proliferation to
arrest in late S or early G2
portion of cell cycle. |
| Pediatric
Dose |
ICE regimen for RTK is
currently investigational; refer to pediatric
oncologist |
|
Contraindications |
Documented hypersensitivity;
hypersensitivity often is caused by the
excipient, so many patients with anaphylactoid
reactions to etoposide may be treated
successfully with etoposide phosphate
|
|
Interactions |
P-glycoprotein modulators (eg,
cyclosporin, verapamil) can increase active
etoposide metabolite concentrations and
increase toxicity; may prolong effects of
warfarin and increase clearance of
methotrexate; cyclosporine and etoposide have
additive effects in cytotoxicity of tumor
cells |
| Pregnancy |
D - Unsafe in pregnancy
|
|
Precautions |
Severe allergic reactions with
anaphylaxis may occur; may cause
myelosuppression, hepatotoxicity, or secondary
AML |
Drug Category: Uroprotective
antidote -- Mesna is a prophylactic
detoxifying agent used to inhibit hemorrhagic
cystitis caused by ifosfamide and cyclophosphamide.
In the kidney, mesna disulfide is reduced to free
mesna. Free mesna has thiol groups that react with
acrolein, which is the ifosfamide and
cyclophosphamide metabolite considered responsible
for urotoxicity.
Drug Name
|
Mesna (Mesnex) -- Inactivates
acrolein and prevents urothelial toxicity
without affecting cytostatic activity.
|
| Pediatric
Dose |
Dose dependent on dose of
ifosfamide or cyclophosphamide and is
typically 60-100% of the antineoplastic agent
used; may be administered as an initial bolus
followed by either IV continuous infusion or
intermittent IV infusions before and following
chemotherapy regimen |
|
Contraindications |
Documented hypersensitivity
|
|
Interactions |
May increase warfarin effects;
adjust dose according to INR target
|
| Pregnancy |
B - Usually safe but benefits
must outweigh the risks. |
|
Precautions |
Monitor morning urine for
hematuria before ifosfamide or
cyclophosphamide dose; common adverse effects
include hypotension, headache, GI toxicity,
and limb pain |
Further Inpatient Care:
- Treatment for RTK requires
frequent inpatient admissions for chemotherapy
administration and for complications of
treatment (eg, febrile neutropenia). The
duration of therapy is approximately 6-12
months.
Further Outpatient Care:
- Outpatient care during
chemotherapy: The myelosuppressive effects of
chemotherapy used to treat RTK necessitate
frequent monitoring of blood counts on an
outpatient basis. Additionally, serum
electrolyte levels and renal function must be
observed closely because these patients have a
single kidney and often receive the nephrotoxic
agents ifosfamide and carboplatin. A requirement
for electrolyte supplementation is not uncommon.
- Outpatient care after the
completion of therapy: The current NWTSG
recommendations for follow-up monitoring of
patients with RTK are as follows:
- Chest radiograph - Every 3
months (6X), every 6 months (3X), yearly (2X),
and then as indicated
- Abdominal ultrasound -
Every 3 months (6X), every 6 months (3X),
yearly (2X), and then as indicated
- MRI scan of the head
(alternatively, CT scan) - At the end of
therapy and as indicated
In/Out Patient Meds:
- Chemotherapy regimens for RTK
are myelosuppressive. The use of hematopoietic
growth factors, such as granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
(GM-CSF), is recommended. In addition, because
the therapy is immunosuppressive, prophylaxis
against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
(PCP) with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or
aerosolized pentamidine is recommended.
Transfer:
- Initial transfer to the care
of a pediatric oncologist, preferably at a
center that participates in clinical trials, is
recommended.
Deterrence/Prevention:
- Because the cause of RTK is
unknown, no preventive measures can be
prescribed.
Complications:
- Complications related to
tumor progression: RTK can progress rapidly in
the abdomen and at metastatic sites, including
the lungs, liver, and brain. RTK can be
associated with tumor hemorrhage and organ
failure.
- Complications related to
treatment: RTK can be associated with both acute
and chronic toxicities.
- Hematologic: The major
acute complication of chemotherapy for RTK is
myelosuppression, which places patients at
risk of serious infections. Patients require
frequent red blood cell and platelet
transfusions.
- Renal: Patients may have
renal tubular dysfunction, with wasting of
protein, phosphorous, bicarbonate, and other
electrolytes, if platinum drugs or ifosfamide
is used. Vincristine and cyclophosphamide
rarely can cause the syndrome of inappropriate
secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH). The
long-term prevalence of renal failure is
unknown because RTK is rare and the survival
rate is low. Renal failure is uncommon in
patients with unilateral Wilms tumor; however,
patients with RTK are treated more intensively
and with more nephrotoxic drugs.
- Cardiac: Some treatment
regimens for RTK include anthracyclines, which
can cause arrhythmias and congestive heart
failure. Monitor cardiac function
periodically.
- Gastrointestinal:
Chemotherapy agents used for the treatment of
RTK can cause mucositis, nausea, and vomiting.
Vincristine can cause severe constipation with
abdominal cramping and ileus.
- Neurologic: Vincristine can
cause neurologic problems including ptosis,
vocal cord paralysis, intestinal ileus, foot
drop, and seizures. Ifosfamide can induce
altered mental status and coma.
- Urologic: Cyclophosphamide
and ifosfamide can cause hemorrhagic cystitis,
which can be prevented by vigorous hydration
and the use of mesna.
- Reproductive: Abdominal
irradiation and alkylating agents can cause
infertility. Girls who have Wilms tumor and
receive abdominal irradiation are predisposed
to premature labor.
- Second malignancies:
Irradiation, alkylating agents, and etoposide
have been implicated as risk factors for
second malignancies.
Prognosis:
- The prognosis for children
with RTK remains fair to poor, depending upon
the stage at presentation and the age at
diagnosis. The authors hope that new
multi-institutional clinical trials are able to
identify novel therapies that can improve the
outcomes of patients affected with this disease.
Patient Education:
- Educate patients and families
about RTK and its aggressive biological
behavior. While families must be provided with
hope for a cure, they also must be aware of the
unfavorable prognosis associated with RTK.
Furthermore, families must understand the risks
of intensive chemotherapy and the signs and
symptoms that require immediate medical
attention.
|
|
Back to List |
|
|