Hallux valgus (HV) with its accompanying bunion is
a common deformity of the forefoot. Understanding
and characterizing each component of the deformity
is the key to treating it successfully. Many
treatments have been proposed; the best choices
are those that directly address the location of
the deformity.
Problem:
In order for the most
effective surgical procedure to be chosen, the
deformity must be carefully characterized
.
Frequency:
In the United States, the
number of forefoot operations is markedly higher
in females when analyzing the 3 most common
forefoot ailments (HV, hammertoe, neuroma). This
was attributed to differences in footwear
(Coughlin, 1995; Frey, 1993).
Etiology:
Coughlin and associates
have made the connection between shoes that are
too narrow and forefoot complaints in women
(Coughlin, 1995; Frey, 1993).
Clinical:
Patient demands, footwear,
and expectations should be assessed prior to
treating the patient with a bunion deformity.
Obviously, a directed history and physical
examination should be performed to address
vascular status, possible neuropathies, and
medical comorbidities. Activity level must be
assessed as the high-demand athletic patient may
place more emphasis on mobility of the joint than
deformity correction. Finally, footwear must be
addressed. A good radiographic result does not
translate necessarily to unrestricted footwear
use; Mann reported that only 59% of his patients
had unrestricted footwear use after bunion
correction.
For indications for
specific surgical procedures used to address HV
and bunion deformity.
Once footwear modifications
(e.g. shoes with a rounded and enlarged toe box)
have failed to relieve the pain that comes with
the deformity, surgical correction may be offered
to the patient.
Relevant Anatomy: Deformities
encountered in HV surgery center around the first
metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ); however, when
assessing this deformity, one must analyze the
interphalangeal joint (IPJ), the first
metatarsocuneiform (MTC) joint, the hindfoot, and
the ankle. The deformity may involve all of these
levels, which can affect the success of a chosen
operation (Coughlin, 1997; Mann, 1993).
The first MTPJ receives the most
attention in HV surgery. It is a complex joint
consisting of the proximal phalanx (PP), the first
metatarsal (MT) head, and the medial and lateral
sesamoids. The variations in bony anatomy and the
soft tissues that cross this joint determine the
stability of the joint and its tendency to deform
into a valgus alignment (Coughlin, 1997; Mann,
1993). The rounded head of the first MT
articulates with the concave base of the PP. The
shape of the MT head plays a large role in the
tendency to valgus deformity. A more rounded first
MT head is unstable and, therefore, more subject
to deformity when acted on by external forces,
such as narrow-toed shoes (Coughlin, 1995; Hattrup,
1985), and when combined with other commonly
associated deformities of the foot such as pes
planus, hindfoot valgus, and congenitally tight
heel cord. Flatter MT heads are more stable and
less likely to contribute to HV.
The second characteristic that
contributes to HV is the orientation of the
articular surface of the MT head in relation to
the long axis of the first MT (Richardson, 1993)
(see
Picture 1). The distal metatarsal articular
angle (DMAA) describes the lateral slope of the
articular surface in relation to the long axis of
the first MT. Normally, the DMAA is less than 10°.
Surgical decision-making must take into account an
increased DMAA angle.
The orientation of the great toe
is also determined by the proximal phalanx
articular angle (PPAA). This is the angle formed
by the intersection of a line along the long axis
of the PP and a line along the proximal joint
surface of the PP. Deformity at this level
contributes to an increased valgus deformity of
the first toe; however, the deformity is expressed
at the IPJ rather than the MTPJ. The importance of
the DMAA and PPAA cannot be underestimated because
these angles reflect the lateral inclination of
the joint. Correction of these angles must be a
goal of any surgery chosen to address the bunion
deformity.
MTPJ congruence is another
factor that is considered when choosing a
procedure for bunion correction. The congruence of
the joint is determined by combining the PPAA and
the DMAA. The lines drawn parallel to the joint
surface of both the PP and the first MT head
should be parallel. When the lines are parallel, a
congruent joint exists. When they are not
parallel, an incongruous or subluxed joint exists.
This relationship is important to consider when
choosing the surgical procedure; intraarticular
procedures (ie, distal soft tissue realignment [DSTR])
should not be used with a congruent joint that has
an increased DMAA and/or increased PPAA.
Congruent joints with an
increased DMAA must be addressed with
extraarticular procedures (ie, osteotomies) in
order to prevent converting a congruent joint to
an incongruent joint. An incongruent joint,
because of the unusual stresses on the joint would
be more prone to development of osteoarthritic
changes.
The 2 angles most commonly
involved in HV deformity are the hallux valgus
angle (HVA) and the 1-2 intermetatarsal angle (IMA).
The HVA is formed by the intersection of the lines
along the long axis of the PP and the first MT.
This angle is measured easily. The normal angle
should be less than 15°. The next important
measurement is the angle formed by the
intersecting long axis lines along the first and
second MTs (1-2 IMA). Normally this angle should
be less than 9°.
The final joint that must be
assessed carefully is the MTC joint. The shape and
orientation of this joint vary and affect the
medial inclination for the first MT. It is
difficult to make reliable radiographic
measurements of this joint because these
measurements can vary depending on the plane of
the x-ray beam. Excessive obliquity is associated
with hypermobility instability of the first MTC
joint. Hypermobility of the first MT head as it
moves through its oblique axis from dorsomedial to
plantar lateral is believed to contribute to the
deformity and is accentuated by the obliquity of
the joint. Excessive medial obliquity is
associated with instability.
The final bony anatomic
considerations involve the sesamoids. The
sesamoids are located in the flexor hallucis
brevis (FHB) tendon and lie under the first MT
head. They have an important weight-bearing
function in addition to improving the
biomechanical axis of the FHB action. The plantar
aspect of the first MT head has a longitudinal
intersesamoid ridge in its center termed the
crista. The sesamoids lie on either side of this
ridge as they articulate with the plantar surface
of the first MT head. Normally, they should be
centered under the first MT head on the standing
anteroposterior radiograph of the foot. As the
great toe develops a valgus deformity, the first
MT head deviates medially, and rotation occurs at
the MTPJ. The great toe pronates, the intrinsic
musculature rotates laterally, and the first MT
head displaces medially, subluxing off the
sesamoids.
Normally, the sesamoids should
be centered under the first MT head, and
corrective procedures that restore this
relationship should be chosen.
Other considerations in
assessing the deformity include associated pes
planus deformity, pronation of the great toe, and
an Achilles tendon (AT) contraction. The AT has a
dynamic effect on ambulation. A contracted AT
compromises ability to dorsiflex the foot. During
gait, the result is external rotation with
increased demands placed on the medial structures
of the forefoot. The HV deformity is believed to
be a result of this repetitive stress. A
contracted AT can be idiopathic or a result of a
neuromuscular disease. Either should be noted on
the physical examination because their presence
can contribute to recurrence of deformity if they
are not addressed.
In addition to the bony anatomy
of the deformity, the soft tissue envelope at the
first MTPJ plays a role in the HV deformity. The
first MT head has no direct muscle attachments, so
its position is influenced greatly by the
alignment of the PP. Essentially, 4 groups of
muscles and tendons cross the first MTPJ and
attach on the proximal aspect of the PP. The
balance of these structures and the bony contour
of the joint determine whether the PP stays
aligned on the MT head. Dorsally, the extensor
hallucis longus (EHL) and extensor hallucis brevis
(EHB) insert centrally on the distal and proximal
phalanges respectively. They are kept in a central
position by the hood ligaments, a fibrous band of
tissue that is anchored to the collateral
ligaments.
On the plantar surface, the
flexor hallucis longus (FHL) runs centrally
between the sesamoids and inserts on the distal
phalanx. The FHB has 2 tendon slips, which insert
into the medial and lateral sesamoids. The
sesamoids then connect into the PP through the
plantar plate. Medially, the abductor hallucis
tendon inserts into the plantar medial PP and
plantar medial joint capsule. The capsule becomes
much thinner dorsally.
A similar relationship exists on
the lateral side of the joint with the adductor
hallucis tendon inserting onto the lateral
sesamoid and plantar lateral joint capsule. The
abductor hallucis has 2 muscle bellies, which are
the transverse head and the oblique head. These
come together in the conjoined tendon and insert
on the lateral sesamoid. Comparatively, more
muscle mass is present in the adductor hallucis
when the muscle bellies are combined, creating a
natural tendency to pull the PP into valgus.
These 4 groups of attachments
create a delicate balance for keeping the PP
centered on the first MT head. This balance is
enhanced greatly when the first MT head is
relatively flat. When the head is rounded, it is
much easier for the PP to deviate. Once a
deviation is created, the forces quickly are
unbalanced. The insertion of the adductor hallucis
onto the lateral plantar base of the PP becomes
the primary deforming force as the HV increases.
Since its insertion is on the plantar half of the
capsule and sesamoid, it tends to pronate the toe.
As the rotation occurs, the abductor hallucis
becomes more plantar, and the only medial
restraint left is the thin dorsal joint capsule,
which readily becomes attenuated.
Once an angular deformity
exists, the EHL and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB)
are no longer centered on the PP and bowstring
across the lateral side of the deformity, creating
further imbalance. In considering the treatment of
HV, one must address both the bony deformity and
the soft tissue balance since both contribute to
the pathologic condition.
Contraindications:
Contraindications
to surgery include feet with vascular
insufficiency or an active infection.
Lab Studies:
- In general, specific lab
studies are unnecessary. However, it behooves
the surgeon to be aware of subtleties. For
example, if small punched out lesions are noted
around the articular surfaces, a uric acid level
may help rule out gout. If symmetrical narrowing
is appreciated in the MTP joints, a rheumatoid
factor may be helpful in ruling out rheumatoid
arthritis. Finally if there is any appearance
either clinically or radiographically of
infection, than a sedimentation rate would be
valuable to help rule out infection.
Imaging Studies:
- A standing foot x-ray is
mandatory in the AP and lateral planes when
determining surgery for bunion correction.
Additionally, an oblique, non-standing film is
usually obtained to obtain a different
perspective of the metatarsal head and hindfoot.
A sesamoid view, although seldom necessary
should also be obtained if there appears to be a
special problem with the sesamoids, eg, fracture
or avascular necrosis. All of this is then put
together with the clinical picture to make a
determination of the best surgical procedure for
the patient.
Medical therapy:
Nonoperative treatment
should be the first option discussed. The first
aspect of HV treatment is for patients to wear
properly fitting shoes. The forefoot should be no
more than 0.5 cm wider than the toe box of the
shoe. Women who wear shoes narrower than this have
a higher incidence of forefoot complaints
(Coughlin, 1995; Frey, 1993). Shoe modifications
such as bubble stretching can be effective to ease
the pressure over a bony prominence. Some
nonprescription devices also can provide
symptomatic relief, although none have been
demonstrated to achieve lasting correction.
Surgical therapy:
A multitude of procedures
are available to correct the deformity, and
results of surgery can be quite variable if the
deformity is not addressed directly. Table 1
divides HV deformities into mild, moderate, and
severe. This categorization is used extensively in
order to simplify choosing the best procedure.
This algorithm is probably best used to choose a
category of procedure rather than a specific
procedure.
Table 1. Categories of Hallux
Valgus Deformity
|
Mild |
Moderate |
Severe |
| HVA |
<20º |
20º-40º |
>40º |
| 1-2 IMA |
<11º |
<15º |
>15º |
| Sesamoid
|
<50º |
50-75% |
>75% |
Subluxation
HVA1-2 IMA - First - second IM angle
Distal soft tissue reconstruction (DSTR)
Surgical options fall into
several broad categories, as follows: distal soft
tissue reconstruction (DSTR), PP and first MT
(distal and proximal) osteotomies, arthrodesis (MTPJ
and first tarsometatarsal [TMT]), and resection.
Distal soft tissue
reconstruction
The mild HV deformity can be
corrected with a DSTR (McBride, 1967). This
consists of medial eminence excision and medial
capsulorraphy. On the lateral side, the deforming
structures must be released to balance the toe.
This typically is performed through a dorsal
longitudinal incision in the first webspace. The
conjoined tendon is released from the lateral
sesamoid. The transverse MT ligament is released
from its attachment on the lateral sesamoid as
well. The lateral joint capsule is divided
parallel to the joint surface. The proximal
portion of the released adductor tendon may be
sutured to the proximal joint capsule of the MTPJ,
or the capsule may be sutured to the medial
capsule of the second MTPJ.
This soft tissue procedure is
considered an intraarticular realignment. It must
only be performed in persons with deformities with
a round MT head and a relatively normal DMAA and
PPAA. This procedure realigns the toe provided
that the bony anatomy accepts this realignment. In
reality, the DSTR is seldom used alone and is
usually combined with a boney procedure.
Summary of DSTR is as follows:
- Indications
- Mild-to-moderate bunion
deformity
- HVA <30º
- IMA <15º
- Nonelevated DMAA
- Noncongruent joint
- Expected corrections
- Complications
- Hallux varus - Usually
asymptomatic if >10º; incidence significantly
lowered by not excising the lateral sesamoid
- Recurrence of deformity -
Occurs when procedure is extended to bigger
deformities or when bony alignment not
favorable (eg, elevated DMAA)
Akin osteotomy
Osteotomy of either the PP
and/or the first MT is used extensively to correct
alignment of the first ray. The PP osteotomy (Akin
procedure) is a medially based closing wedge
osteotomy of the PP (Akin, 1925; Brahms, 1994;
Goldberg, 1987; Plattner, 1990). It is combined
with medial eminence excision and medial
capsulorrhaphy. This procedure is best for
deformity in the PP manifesting as HV
interphalangeus in which the PPAA is abnormal.
Akin osteotomy also may be combined with a first
MT osteotomy to compensate alignment created by an
elevated DMAA (Mitchell, 1991).
The incision is made just
proximal to the medial eminence, and is extended
distally to the IPJ. The dissection is taken down
to the joint capsule. Once exposed, a vertical
capsulotomy is made with not more than 2-4 mm of
capsule removed. The medial eminence is next
excised in line with the shaft of the first MT and
just medial to the sagittal sulcus. Next, the
osteotomy of the PP is completed, removing 3-4 mm
of bone. Care must be taken at the proximal cut to
ensure that the articular surface is not violated.
The medial capsule is then repaired first in order
to observe the amount of correction that must be
completed with the osteotomy. The osteotomy is
then fixed with Kirschner wires (K-wires) or
suture. Care must be taken to check for correct
rotation as the osteotomy is fixed.
Summary of Akin osteotomy is as
follows:
- Indications
- HV interphalangeus
- Also can be combined with
other procedures to compensate for an
increased DMAA in a congruent joint
- Expected corrections
- May correct 10-15° of
deformity in PP
- HVA tends to recur
according to long-term follow-up results
- Has no effect on 1-2 IMA
- Complications
- Recurrence of deformity
- Poor cosmetic appearance
First metatarsal osteotomy
The next category of procedure
for HV correction is the first MT osteotomy. This
can be divided into distal and proximal
osteotomies. Distal osteotomies are mainly for
individuals with mild deformities (eg, HVA <30º,
1-2 IMA <13º) (Austin, 1981; Johnson, 1991;
Johnson, 1979). Some authors have advocated use of
this in deformities as large as 15º in the 1-2 IMA.
This can work depending on the osteotomy chosen.
Chevron distal metatarsal
osteotomy
One of the more commonly used
distal osteotomies is the chevron ostectomy (see
Picture 6). This osteotomy is performed
through a medial incision. An L-shaped capsulotomy
is performed to expose the medial eminence. The
exostosis is removed with a saw, with a cut
parallel to the medial border of the foot. Making
the exostectomy cut parallel to the medial border
of the foot increases the surface area of contact
for the chevron osteotomy. On the other hand,
making the cut parallel to the medial metatarsal
shaft obviates the danger of removing too much
medial eminence. If too much is removed, it can
result in loss of support for the proximal phalanx
with a resultant varus deformity. Once the medial
eminence is resected, an ink marker is used to
outline the chevron. The apex is placed in the
center of the MT head. The osteotomy is V-shaped;
the angle of the chevron may vary. Making one limb
longer than the other is advantageous because this
simplifies fixation. The author makes theplantar
limb longer. Care is taken not to overpenetrate
the lateral cortex as this may lead to damage of
the lateral soft tissues.
Once the osteotomy is complete,
the MT head is translated laterally. This is
performed by placing a skin hook or towel clangs
on the proximal fragment and then sliding the
capital fragment laterally. Sometimes, an
osteotome must be inserted along the osteotomy
cuts to free the soft tissues enough to allow the
lateral translation. Also, when a long plantar
limb is used, the soft issue is more likely to
impede lateral translation; thus, it is
advantageous to gently mobilize the capital
fragment using an osteotome. Excessive
manipulation should be avoided. It is also
important to not let the saw cut extend across the
apex because this can create a stress riser in the
capital fragment when fracture may occur during
manipulation of the MT head. The MT head should be
translated 3-5 mm laterally but no more than one
third the width of MT shaft. It is then fixed with
a single K-wire (0.62), which is inserted from
dorsal-proximal to plantar-distal taking care not
to violate the MT head sesamoid articulation.
The pin is left in place for 4
weeks and removed in the office. The osteotomy is
inherently stable and through metaphyseal bone
that heals quickly. Screws and more complex
fixation methods are not necessary. Due to the
mild risk of sterile abscess, the author chooses
to avoid bioabsorbable implants. However, DeOrio
and Ware have shown that the use of a single
poly-p-dioxanone pin attached to a K-wire can be
used routinely for fixation obviating the need for
external pin placement. After the osteotomy is
fixed, the excess medial cortex of the proximal
fragment is resected in line with the MT head. All
edges are smoothed with a rasp or rongeur. The
capsule can be shortened to gain further
correction by resecting the redundant segment from
the proximal aspect of the limb of the capsulotomy
made parallel to the joint.
Standard compression bunion
dressings are used for 7-8 weeks and changed every
1-2 weeks. As stated above, the pin is removed
after 4 weeks. The patient should expect to return
to full-time footwear in 10-12 weeks. This may
vary depending on any additional procedures done
to the foot (ie, hammertoe correction, bunionette
correction).
Summary of chevron distal MT
osteotomy is as follows:
- Indications
- HVA <30º
- 1-2 IMA <13º
- DMAA <15º
- Expected corrections
- Complications
- Undercorrection when
indications are extended to large deformities
(Hattrup, 1985; Mann, 1982).
- Avascular necrosis in
12-20% (increased incidence when adductor
release is performed)
Proximal metatarsal osteotomy
Proximal MT osteotomies are used
for larger deformities, generally those with an
IMA of greater than 15º. These osteotomies usually
are combined with a DSTR, which is necessary to
correct metatarsophalangeal (MTP) subluxation with
an HVA greater 35º. Many types of osteotomy have
been described. These include a medial opening
wedge, a lateral closing wedge, proximal chevron,
and a crescentic (Coughlin, 1997). The wedge
osteotomies can change the length of the first MT,
and these have not been widely advocated.
Additional osteotomies include the Scarf, Ludloff
and Mao. Presently, the proximal chevron and
crescentic osteotomies are widely used, and, with
proper technique, they can achieve excellent
correction (Mann, 1992; Sammarco, 1993; Thordarson,
1992; Wanivenhaus, 1988).
The author currently uses a
modification of the proximal chevron osteotomy
described by Sammarco (Sammarco, 1993). This is
combined with a DSTR as previously described.
After the distal releases have been performed, the
medial incision is extended proximally to the
level of the first TMT joint. The periosteum is
elevated just enough to expose the medial cortex
of the first MT. The osteotomy is designed with
the apex pointing proximally with a long plantar
limb. The angle of the osteotomy is approximately
70-80º. The osteotomy is performed using a
microsagittal saw. Care must be taken not to
extend the cuts past the apex of the osteotomy as
this may create a stress riser and increase the
risk of fracture.
After the osteotomy is
completed, the distal fragment is rotated
laterally with the osteotome; the upper limb
behaves like an opening wedge osteotomy while the
lower limb acts as a shelf to prevent elevation or
depression of the distal fragment. Once the
desired correction is achieved, the osteotomy can
easily be fixed using two 2.7-mm cortical lag
screws placed dorsal to plantar. The resected
medial eminence is morselized and packed into the
opening wedge portion of the osteotomy. Two screws
provide very stable fixation, and the technique of
using an osteotomy with a plantar shelf has been
demonstrated to be biomechanically sound.
Similar correction can be
obtained using a proximal crescentic osteotomy
(Mann, 1992; Thordarson, 1992). This osteotomy is
analogous to the focal dome osteotomy used in
correction of lower extremity deformity. Its main
advantage is that it results in minimal
shortening.
The osteotomy is performed
through a dorsal incision. Care must be taken to
protect the EHL and to avoid injury to the
terminal portion of the medial branch of the
superficial peroneal nerve, which passes over the
first TMT joint. The osteotomy is performed 1-1.5
cm distal to the first TMT joint. The crescentic
cut is made perpendicular to the plantar surface
of the foot or at a 120º angle to the long axis of
the first MT. Some literature supports doing
either a concave distal or concave proximal
orientation. Either way, care must be taken to
avoid overcorrection. The osteotomy is fixed using
a cortical lag screw going dorsal, distal to
plantar proximal. A K-wire may be added for
rotational stability. Achieving rigid
stabilization is important to avoid loss of
fixation and elevation of the first MT. Rigid
fixation may be difficult to obtain especially in
osteoporotic bone. The author currently uses the
proximal chevron osteotomy because the fixation is
easier to obtain and inherently more stable.
The postoperative course is much
the same as that of the distal MT osteotomy.
Depending on the fixation, a postoperative shoe,
fracture walker, or cast may be used.
Weightbearing is protected for the first 4 weeks.
Generally, most patients do not bear weight much
in the first 3-4 weeks due to pain. Once wound
healing is ensured, weight bearing progresses.
Patients with more proximal procedures have a
slightly longer recovery period.
Summary of proximal first MT
osteotomy with DSTR is as follows:
- Indications
- Expected corrections
- Complications
- Shortening of first ray
(closing wedge)
- Elevation first ray causing
transfer lesion to second MT head
- Undercorrection
- Overcorrection
- Delayed union/malunion
Arthrodesis and resection
First tarsometatarsal fusion
The first TMT arthrodesis can be
used to obtain correction in moderate to severe
categories of HV. Its main use is in the patient
with a hypermobile first ray and a moderate to
severe deformity (1-2 IMA >15º, HVA >30º) (Klaue,
1994; Maguire, 1973; Mauldin, 1990; Myerson, 1990;
Sangeorzan, 1989). The incidence of hypermobile
first ray has been debated. Mann and Coughlin have
reported a hypermobile first ray is present in
fewer than 5% in patients with HV.
TMT arthrodesis also can be used
as a salvage operation after a failed bunion
repair when there is still an increased 1-2 IMA.
Contraindications are juvenile HV with an open
epiphysis, short first ray, and MTP degenerative
arthritis. The procedure is performed through a
dorsal incision extending from the first web space
proximally to the TMT joints. The EHL is retracted
laterally. The subchondral bone is exposed using a
small osteotome to scrape off the cartilage.
In people who truly have a
hypermobile first ray, resection of wedges of bone
may not be necessary. Often, the 1-2 IMA can be
reduced and the joint pinned with wires for
provisional reduction. A radiograph is obtained.
If the positioning of the first ray is acceptable,
it can be fixed after the preparation of the
subchondral surface by feathering using an
osteotome or with multiple drill holes. The
margins of the fusion are bone grafted with local
bone obtained from the bunion resection, distal
tibia, or calcaneus.
In persons in whom the first TMT
cannot be reduced, joint resection is performed
with a microsagittal saw removing biplanar wedge
based lateral and plantar. This resection must be
performed carefully to avoid excessive shortening.
Fixation is performed with 3.5-mm cortical screws
placed in lag fashion. Cannulated screws may be
used in persons in whom wire fixation is performed
first to ensure acceptable positioning. The screw
configuration used consists of 3 screws. The first
goes dorsal distal to plantar proximal. The second
goes dorsal proximal to plantar distal crossing
the TMTJ. The third goes transversely medial to
lateral across the bases of MTs 1 and 2. Care must
be taken to maintain compression across the TMTJ.
This procedure is always
combined with DSTR as described previously. The
postoperative course typically involves a longer
recovery than the more distally based procedures.
Patients are placed in a standard soft bunion
dressing with a plaster splint to immobilize the
ankle. At the first dressing change, this is
converted to a short leg cast with a soft spica
dressing to hold the great toe in place. Touchdown
weight bearing is allowed to tolerance. Weight
bearing progresses after the first month, and the
patient is given a fracture walker with a bunion
dressing if radiographs exhibit acceptable signs
of healing. The bunion dressing is continued until
the 2-month postoperative check. At that point, if
radiographs demonstrate fusion, the patient can
progress slowly to wearing a firm-soled shoe.
Typically, it can take another 6 weeks before
patients are comfortably wearing a shoe full time.
Summary of first TMT fusion is
as follows:
- Indications
- HVA >30º
- 1-2 IMA >15º
- MTP subluxation and
hypermobile first ray
- Expected corrections
- Complications
- Nonunion (10-12%)
- Pain (42%)
- Dorsiflexion plantar
flexion malunion
- Overcorrection
- Undercorrection
The final procedures to consider
in bunion correction are joint sacrificing
procedures. These are arthrodesis of the first
MTPJ and resection arthroplasty.
Metatarsophalangeal joint
arthrodesis
Arthrodesis of the first MTPJ is
used for salvage after failed bunion surgery,
bunions associated with osteoarthritis or
rheumatoid arthritis, severe HV (HVA >40°, IMA
>16°). With modern internal fixation methods high
rates of fusion can be achieved (Coughlin, 1994;
Coughlin, 1987; Coughlin, 1990; Mann, 1989; Mann,
1980; Turan, 1987).
Many methods for preparing the
joint have been described. Resection may be
performed with flat surfaces or with reamers that
shape the PP and MT head in mirror images. The
advantage of this latter technique is that less
shortening is achieved and the position of the toe
can be adjusted when hemispheric reamers are
chosen. The most critical aspect of the
arthrodesis is the position of the first toe.
Generally, it should be fused in 15º of valgus,
30º of dorsiflexion in relation to the first MT
and neutral rotation. The best landmarks are
clinical though because the first toe should be
positioned adjacent to the second toe and have
enough dorsiflexion so the surgeon can place the
tip of his finger under the distal phalanx of the
toe being fused when this foot is placed in a
plantigrade position on a hard flat surface.
Too much dorsiflexion leads to
pain at the tip of the toe when the patient wears
shoes; too little dorsiflexion can lead to
premature arthrosis or instability of the first
IPJ. Too much valgus can cause impingement on the
second toe and one must anticipate the gradual
decrease in the IMA that will occur after an MTP
fusion so that impingement does not occur.
The technique currently used by
the author for fusion is hemispheric reaming and
compression screw fixation. If rigid fixation
cannot be obtained with 2 crossed 4.0-mm
cancellous screws, a dorsal plate can be added. It
has been the author's experience that many dorsal
plates become symptomatic and require later
removal; thus, if adequate fixation is achieved
with compression screws, that is all that is used.
The joint is approached through
a dorsal incision. When no previous scars are
present, this incision is used, though the
arthrodesis also can be accomplished through a
previous medical incision if being performed for
recurrent HV. Full-thickness flaps are raised
sharply off the MT head. The collateral ligaments
are elevated and released if necessary to achieve
correction. The medial eminence is removed using a
rongeur or oscillating saw. The articular
cartilage is removed using an osteotome to scrape
it off of the subchondral bone. At this point, the
cannulated hemispheric reamer is used to ream the
surfaces, removing the subchondral bone to expose
cancellous surfaces, which are best for achieving
fusion. Care must be taken not to remove too much
bone. Additionally, when a dorsal approach is
used, a tendency may exist to remove too much bone
dorsally, leading to excessive dorsiflexion. This
can be avoided by increased exposure and plantar
flexion of the PP during the reaming.
Once the joint is prepared, the
surfaces are opposed in the desired position and
pinned with a K-wire. The author uses an
intraoperative fluoroscanner to check position of
the fusion and hardware. Cannulated screws are
used when wire placement is in the desired
position. Two screws are used going from
medial/distal to proximal lateral and
medial/proximal to distal lateral crossing at the
joint. The screw threads should engage the far
cortex and provide rigid fixation. In severely
osteoporotic bone, a plate may be used. A low
profile plate is best chosen with 2.7-mm screws.
In this case, only one screw crosses the joint and
the plate is applied dorsally with 2-3 screws
proximal and distal.
Postoperatively, bulky gauze
compression dressing and a surgical shoe are used.
When fixation is tenuous, a cast or fracture
walker may be used for additional immobilization.
Patients are allowed to bear weight once wound
healing is ensured, usually after 2-3 weeks. After
6 weeks, if fusion is evident on radiographs,
patients are allowed to start bearing weight in a
firm-soled shoe. Most patients have returned to
full time footwear use by 10-12 weeks
postoperatively.
Summary of MTPJ arthrodesis is
as follows:
- Indications
- HV with arthrosis
rheumatoid arthritis
- Neuromuscular conditions (spasticity)
- Recurrent valgus (HVA >40°)
- Complications
- Nonunion (generally <10%
with internal fixation techniques)
- Malunion (too little valgus,
increase IPJ arthrosis)
- Excessive plantar flexion
(pressure at tip of toe and increase IPJ
arthrosis)
- Excessive dorsiflexion
(intractable plantar keratosis first MTH pain
at tip of toe or nail dorsally)
- Painful hardware
- Infection
Excisional arthroplasty
(Keller-Privdere)
Resection arthroplasty is rarely
used for correction of HV. It should be used for
moderate deformity with coincident arthrosis in
patients who are elderly with low demands
(Richardson, 1990; Vallier, 1991; Wrighton, 1972).
The procedure can accomplish mild correction,
decompresses the MTPJ, and heals quickly. It does
result in shortening of the toe, loss of push off
power, and, in cases when excessive resection is
performed, may result in a cock-up deformity due
to loss of the plantar attachment of the FHB. It
should be used mainly as a salvage procedure in
low-demand patients.
The procedure can be performed
through either a dorsal or medial incision. A
medial incision is preferred because it allows
medial capsular plication to accomplish correction
of alignment. The capsule is elevated from distal
to proximal leaving the proximal, with the
proximal attachment remaining. It is tagged with a
resorbable suture. The medial eminence is excised.
The base of the PP is exposed. Care must be taken
to preserve the plantar capsule. The cut is made
at the metaphyseal flare. Excessive resection
leads to shortening and increases the chances of a
cock-up deformity; thus, only the proximal 25% of
the phalanx should be excised. After excision, the
capsule is repaired to the remaining phalanx
through drill holes. Repairing the plantar capsule
is essential to minimize the risk of postoperative
cock-up deformity. Medial capsular repair corrects
the vagus deformity. The joint is then pinned with
2 crossed .062-in K-wires, which are removed 3-5
weeks postoperatively.
A standard soft gauze
postoperative bunion dressing is used and the
patient is allowed limited weight bearing in a
postoperative shoe. Walking should be restricted
to avoid the complication of pin breakage.
Summary of excisional
arthroplasty (Keller-Privdere) is as follows:
- Indication - Moderate HV in a
low-demand patient with osteoarthrosis of the
MTPJ
- Expected corrections
- HVA correction up to 50%,
best results when HVA <30º
- IMA minimal correction
- Complications
- MT due to loss of
weight-bearing function of great toe (Results
tend to deteriorate with time.)
- Cock-up deformity
- Shortening
- Flail toe
- Diminished push off
strength
Preoperative details:
It is worth
repeating, that it is critical to obtain high
quality standing x-rays in the AP and lateral
direction prior to proceeding with surgery.